The Perils to Justice A Judge Thinks Aloud

In this frank and revealing narrative of the vicissitudes of his life as a lawyer and a judge, spread over a period of eight decades, the author, while referring to the perils to justice, holds the superior judiciary in high esteem and suggests that judicial activism should match with the constantly changing social purpose and environment, without, however, exceeding the boundaries.
Key features :

Judiciary — to whom accountable
Does review power surpass limitations
Global quality versus reservations
Hung Parliament and coalition government 
Clashes and conflicts in the organs of State